Sean wrote:I did. You have to tell the ecu what the sensor is, what is the calibration etc else you wont get a reading. Have you a log file from the ecu?
We've done that as well - Bosche LTU 4.0 and a calibration number of 839.
No difference.
Sean wrote:I did. You have to tell the ecu what the sensor is, what is the calibration etc else you wont get a reading. Have you a log file from the ecu?
Billzilla wrote:Sean wrote:Assuming the ECU is enabled for lambda, or still has some of the initial free lambda left, you will need to define the sensor under ADJUST - SENSOR SETUP - WIDEBAND LAMBDA SETUP Also, I would clear Aux 1 (lambda heater) table axes and make it a single value of 0
I'm not after closed-loop operation, just trying to get the Quick Lambda working so I can sort out the map in the lower revs enough to take it for a drive.
Have a look at the file I uploaded if you like, I'm pretty sure all that stuff is set-up correctly.
JulianEdgar wrote:http://www.motec.com.au/filedownload.../ECU%20Tuning%20April2010.pdf? - page 70 onwards has best instructions I have found for connecting a PLM to ECU (and no Lambda ECU upgrade needed)
JulianEdgar wrote:Google 'motec ecu tuning pdf' - it's the first on the list.
Scott@FP wrote:Ref/Sync Mode 28 notes say to use rising edge, not falling edge, is there a reason to use falling edge on this cam and crank setup?
Billzilla wrote:A quick question on this - Where are the notes on this? I've done a search and can't find anything on it.
FWIW the engine ran nicely with falling edge, when it was a more standard unit, for years.
Billzilla wrote:AFAIK you only need the lambda option for closed-loop operation, it's not needed for Quick Lambda.
I may well be wrong though ....
Scott@FP wrote:Hit 'F1' key when on ref/sync mode setup. Scroll down to the appropriate mode for notes.
Scott@FP wrote:You have La turned off for a direct wired sensor under adjust/sensor setup/wide band La setup.
The adjust/functions/La Control setup parameters are for when you have La control enabled.
If it ran fine previously it must be due to some change somewhere, make sure all the important sensors are giving rational readings, then investigate the new cam/sync setup and make sure its fully compatible with what you are trying to do. 102/106 lobe centers shouldn't make it run terrible, just extra overlap, this in and of itself will make you need to redo the fuel table where you previously had full VVT activity.
AdamW wrote:Your ref/sync capture shown earlier would need a falling edge to trigger correctly so I would ignore the motec note in this case and leave both sensors set to falling. Your sensors are probably just wired "back-to-front" to what was intended.
AdamW wrote:You do need the lambda upgrade to use the internal wideband controller with a directly wired sensor. You will need to use the PLM if you don't have the upgrade.
Do you get any errors showing when the misfire/bad running happens?
Return to M400, M600, M800 and M880 ECUs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests