M800 shift function vs GCU for paddle shift

Discussion and support for MoTeC's previous generation ECUs.

M800 shift function vs GCU for paddle shift

Postby XSESIV on Tue Nov 05, 2013 7:34 pm

Has anyone had any experience with controlling a sequential gearbox via paddle shift using the M800 shift function as apposed to using a dedicated GCU like Geartronics? What are the pros and cons of either option?

Got a Holinger sequential in an Evo 9 time attack car with some paddles and DBW. I prefer not to have a dedicated GCU for complexity and an extra device to worry about but does a GCU give any performance or mechanical sympathy benefit over using the M800 shift function?

Been trying to compare both options, the only things I think the M800 can't do is engage reverse only when speed is zero, use a neutral lockout via button, deal with any dog-to-dog situations, start a throttle blip before down shift and maybe auto down shifts. Has anyone found ways to do these in the M800?
XSESIV
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 1:32 pm

Re: M800 shift function vs GCU for paddle shift

Postby br21 on Tue Nov 19, 2013 2:54 am

I've got some experience with controlling sequentials and paddles using Motec ECUs. Drop me your email and we can share experiences.
br21
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 9:59 pm

Re: M800 shift function vs GCU for paddle shift

Postby XSESIV on Tue Dec 10, 2013 10:22 pm

Thanks, PM sent.
XSESIV
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 1:32 pm


Return to M400, M600, M800 and M880 ECUs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests