by SportsCarRacer on Tue May 19, 2009 3:15 pm
I work in OEM engine developement, where in-cylinder pressure measurements are routinely done during the engine mapping/calibration process (ie: setting ignition timing, cam timing, etc.). The sensors to do the job PROPERLY are made by AVL or KISTLER (type 6023 or 6125A are the best), and must be fitted in a very specific location and manner in the chamber to avoid resonance and aliased readings. The sensors start at $3050 each, and are fragile enough to be very easily damged by excessive detonation (6125A better). Also, they can be bought or adapted for use as spark plug mounted sensors, where a grrove or channel is cut down the side of the sparkplug, and a thin stainless tube brazed in the groove, terminating above the sparkplug hex with a boss to screw in the Kistler sensor. As you can imagine, on a modern DOHC head with deep spark plug wells, this is a difficult proposition...and mounted in this way, there is a fair loss of resolution and accuracy due to the addtional volume of the tube, and the distance from the chamber.
These type of sesnors are all charge-based sesnors....output is in coulombs, and therefore they need a charge amp for each sensor, this then outputs a voltage into a VERY high speed DSP (dig sig processor)...the encoder is fitted onto the front of the crank, ususally with 0.1 or 1deg resolution, to provide index for mechanical TDC. The DSP samples the pressure waveform at VERY high speed, does FFT analysis, and provides statistical data for cycle to cycle variation......a lot of things which make the in-cyl pressure measurement useful.
I have used high speed data logging to log the output of a charge amp & kistler, but it is of little values...the cycle-to cycle variation is way bigger than you could imagine in most cases.....thus the DSP looks at a larger number of samples, and then outputs an average of between 20 and 720 cycles (revs essentially), making the data meaningful.
If you stop to think about it, 1 degree resolution (the minimum acceptable to be useful for the pressure data) means generally at least 4 point per degree, preferably 10.....at such hihg speed (100MhZ sample rate), even running the engine for a minute generates a HUGE number of pressure peaks, and all of them slightly different, and therfore difficult to make sense out of.
If you sampled at the rates suggested, you'd miss all the action....the peaks are very steep, with fast rise time.
In cylinder pressure measurement is VERY DIFFICULT.....this is why the equipment is so expensive. Every manufacturer and specialised engine developement group (FEV, AVL, Ricardo, ProDrive, Roush) are always tring to improve the affordability of the kit...typically starts at 85000 for 4cyl kit.....not many high end race teams even have access to this stuff...i remeber showing one of the premier V8 supercar chiefs through the benefits of the system, and how easy it makes mapping & finding gains, and they were amazed.....but they still don't have the kit.!
The only afforadable way of measuring cyl pressure has been via the ionisation energy of the spark plug...but it needs a fair bit of characterisation for the engine you are using. Harley davidson use this method for knock detection on air-cooled engines (too noisy for knock sensor), but has to be modelled for spark plug temp, etc.
Saab also uses similar methodology....
I'll see if i can find the info on Harley's & saab's system...i have it at work somewhere.
What do you want to measure cylinder pressure for?
I think i know why you want to do it, but i think you are resigned like the rest of us that it is not in the everyday sphere of engine developemnt / modification.
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news....